Friday, March 07, 2008

Children's Advocate March-April issue

The Children's Advocate March-April 2008 issue is now available -- and online -- in English and Spanish. This issue includes articles about grassroots activism -- and efforts to push for a fair budget -- along with a package of articles for families and early care and education staff about helping kids learn to control their impulses. Check it out:
  • Moms' walking group leads push for a walkable neighborhood

  • Pushing for a fair budget: Parents and advocates mobilize to fight the proposed
    state budget cuts

  • Kids with attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity can learn to control
    their impulses
    -- but they need special support

  • After-school programs are multiplying because of funding from Prop 49. How
    can parents make sure their children benefit?

  • Parents and parent educators offer tips for helping children learn to control
    their impulses

  • Children's books on keeping impulses in check

  • News from the California Child Development CORPS: The Corps mobilizes to
    fight proposed budget cuts

  • News from Parent Voices: Spreading the word about tax credits

  • News from the Children's Advocates Roundtable

In English at http://www.4children.org/current.htm
In Spanish at http://www.4children.org/current.htm#esp
And Chinese coming soon!

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Round-up of some recent studies and reports

  • Implementing Policies to Reduce the Likelihood of Preschool Expulsion
    * Preschool teachers are more likely to expel children with behavior problems when teachers are highly stressed at work, teach in classes with high teacher-child ratios, or teach in extended-day classes.
    * Teachers' education and years of experience played little role in the percentage of children expelled -- though, of course, these play an important role in positive interactions with children and learning opportunities.
    * Report includes policy recommendations.


  • Gaps seen in communities' student autism services
    * Children are more likely to be diagnosed with autism when they are in higher-income, mostly white New York school districts than when they are in poorer districts with a high percentage of children of color.
    * Advocates point to several factors -- poor people have less access to health care and aren't getting as much special-education help from the state, white parents push for a diagnosis while parents of color are more wary of "special education" labels. And, though the article doesn't address it, no doubt racism and language barriers (for parents who speak a language other than English) play a role, as well.
    * We're planning an article in the Children's Advocate about this issue in California -- stay tuned!


  • A Mother’s Oral Health Profoundly Impacts the Health of Her Child
    * Pregnant women with poor oral health are seven times more likely to have a premature and/or low birthweight delivery -- and 18% of premature births are attributed to mothers' poor oral health.
    * Children of mothers with poor oral health are five times more likely to have oral health problems.
    * Report includes policy recommendations.


  • Young Boys Watching Violent TV at Risk of Anti-Social Behavior Later (study -- summary)
    * Boys under five in the study who watched violent TV programs were much more likely to have aggressive and anti-social behavior when they were seven to nine years old.
    * No association between violent TV and aggression was found for girls in the study.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Brood Awakenings

And here's another interesting resource --

The online environmental news site, Grist, has put together a package of articles that tackles some of the environmental health issues faced by families, including
* chemicals and reproduction
* dealing with the plastics scare
* kid-proofing your cleaning supplies
* toys -- avoiding toxic ones and finding alternatives to disposable ones
* eco-causes of early puberty
* the need for more public investment in school lunches

Several of articles include stories about how parents are navigating these challenges along with all the usual challenges of raising kids.

http://www.grist.org/feature/2007/09/17/parenting/index.html

Labels: ,

Monday, October 22, 2007

Toxic toys recalled

It seems like we've been innundated this year by recalls of toxic children's toys and products -- many with dangerously high amounts of lead. But you may not have heard about advocates' campaigns to make toys safer by strengthening testing and product standards:

Don't lick Elmo! is an opportunity to urge Congress to make sure that food and products imported from other countries are safe.

Get the Lead Out! is a petition by Moms Rising, calling on Congress and the Consumer Product Safety Commission to test children's products for toxic chemicals.

For background, see Toys recalled
For an up-to-date list of recalled products, see Recalls and Product Safety News

Labels: , ,

Monday, August 13, 2007

Good schools as a human right

You know that the lousy schools in poor neighborhoods have devastating effects on the lives of kids and reinforce injustice. Educational inequity violates the human rights of students in low-income communities and communities of color.

Now there’s a new training manual for advocates, organizers, community members, parents, and youth interested in using a human rights framework as a tool for improving public education in the U.S. It was produced by the National Economic and Social Rights Initiative (NESRI) and Community Asset Development Re-defining Education (CADRE), a grassroots parent organization in L.A.

The manual includes three training curricula: (1) Know Your Human Rights -- Introduces participants to basic human rights principles, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and standards for the right to education; (2) Using Human Rights for Social Change -- Introduces participants to strategies for using the language and principles of human rights in their campaigns and messaging; (3) Taking Action by Documenting Human Rights Abuses -- Introduces participants to research methods for documenting rights violations in schools and tips for using documentation as an organizing tool. The appendix includes training handouts and exercises, a glossary of human rights terms, and excerpts from human rights treaties and declarations recognizing the right to education. To order hard copies email info@nesri.org or call 212-253-1710. Available in English and Spanish online in PDF format at:http://www.nesri.org/programs/education_manual.html

Labels: , ,

Friday, August 10, 2007

Budget action

California still doesn't have a 2007-08 budget, which means some early care and education programs aren't getting the funds they need to stay open. Senate Republicans refuse to vote for the current budget unless it includes $1 billion in additional cuts.

The California Child Development Administrators Association is calling on advocates to contact Republicans about the impact of the budget delay on child care programs, staff, parents, and children -- and to urge them to vote yes on the Assembly budget. For more information, contact CCDAA, 800-835-3083, or see California State Budget Delay and Mass-Layoff Law

Labels: , ,

Investing in children and families saves money

There’s been a number of new reports and studies proving what advocates for children already know – money invested in programs for children and families can save a lot more money in the long-run than these programs cost to operate. Here’s a sampling of the reports I’ve come across recently, hopefully you’ll find them useful in your advocacy efforts:

Early care and education:
Enriching Children, Enriching the Nation, from the Economic Policy Institute, finds that California would save $12 dollars for every dollar it invested in a targeted, high quality, publicly funded preschool program -- or $8 dollars for every dollar it invested in a similar universal preschool program. This is because participants would earn more, commit fewer crimes, and not need as many public benefits.


School-age children:
Returns to the Public from Investing in an Excellent Education, hosted by the Public Education Network, finds that the public would save $2 to $4 for every dollar invested in key high school completion programs for young black males -- because, as adults, they would commit fewer crimes, have lower health costs, and earn more.

Afterschool Programs: Keeping Kids -- and Communities -- Safe, from the Afterschool Alliance, finds afterschool programs help prevent youth crime.


Health:
Economic Cost of Domestic Hunger, hosted by the Sodexho Foundation, finds that hunger costs the US $90 billion each year -- but it would only take $10 to $12 billion to end serious hunger with more food stamps and nutrition programs.

Costs of Care for Medi-Cal Children After a Gap in Coverage, from the California Endowment, studied children who lost Medi-Cal coverage for three months before being able to reenroll. Finds that children's health care costs after they reenrolled were almost twice as much as before the break in coverage.


Child welfare:
Protecting Kids, Reducing Crime, Saving Money, from Fight Crime: Invest in Kids, finds investment in home visiting programs would help prevent nearly half of child abuse and neglect -- and save millions because participants would need fewer social services and commit fewer crimes.


Poverty:
The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children, by James Heckman and Dimitriy Masterov, argues for more funding for early interventions for disadvantaged children. Benefits include lower crime rates and fewer school dropouts and teenage pregnancies.

From Poverty to Prosperity, from the Center for American Progress Task Force on Poverty, finds that child poverty costs the US $500 billion each year in lost productivity, crime, and health care costs -- but cutting total poverty in half over 10 years would cost about $90 billion a year. Recommends tax credits; education; help with housing, child care, and building assets; promotion of unions; and raising the minimum wage.


And Save money: Invest in kids and families is an article we wrote a couple years ago on this, which talks about the more important older studies, such as the Perry Preschool and Abecedarian programs, if you want to pull data from that.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, July 05, 2007

School discipline/parents’ rights

People call our office when they have tough problems and there’s no obvious place to go for an answer. Often these problems have to do with arbitrary/harsh/racist/etc. school discipline decisions. We do our best to suggest resources, but it’s always inadequate.

So I was delighted to see that Carolyn Goossen, of New America Media, has written a step-by-step guide for parents: ‘My Child Just Got Expelled’ – What Every California Parent Should Know About School Discipline http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=90f1622ef1ce3e2185d1ca373c003bd0&from=rss

I hope parents and everyone who works with parents will print this out and keep it handy for the next time you are faced with a situation you feel is unfair. The article ends with an important point – if you think unfair discipline is a pattern at your child’s school, you don’t have to deal with this only on a case-by-case basis. You can organize with other parents and demand change.

I would just add that this applies, not only to racial bias in discipline (which is a huge problem) but also to harsh/arbitrary discipline in general. It’s a long tradition in public education to decide kids are “no good” and declare war on them. It happens to kids of color disproportionately but it happens to kids of every background.

For some inspiration on the possibilities of organizing for a positive, supportive approach to discipline, see the article in our May ’07 issue, www.4children.org/news/507gse.htm

Labels: , ,

Thursday, April 19, 2007

Infant/Toddler Learning Foundations too

In addition to developing "preschool learning foundations" (a catalog of things that typically developing children can do at ages three and four, see previous post), the California Department of Education is also developing "infant/toddler learning foundations" covering development in four domains: social/emotional, cognitive, language, and motor and perceptual. As with the preschool foundations, the CDE has posted a draft on their web site and plans to gather input on them at four public hearings and through the Internet.

The public hearings are the same days and locations as the public hearings on the preschool foundations; the preschool meetings are from 9 to 12 in the morning, the infant/toddler meetings are from 1 to 3 in the afternoon. The hearings will be at the state Department of Education in Sacramento May 11 and at county offices of education in Fresno (May 16), San Mateo (May 17) and LA (May 22).

There will also be a way to provide feedback on the web site in May. However it doesn’t look like they’re planning the kind of regional input sessions around the state that they are holding for the preschool foundations.

For more on the infant/toddler foundations, including links to the draft foundations, go to http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/re/itfoundations.asp

Why you should participate
All the foundations are based on "the research." However, as many people pointed out in the first meetings on the preschool foundations, most of the research has been done on children in white Anglo middle class mainstream families. Meanwhile, much recent research has also shown that development is powerfully shaped by interaction with the environment. To me that suggests that some of the current orthodoxy about what’s "typical development" might not fully reflect the behavior and development of children in other cultures.

So what that means, folks, is that people who have real-life experience with the diverse young children in California have very valuable information to share with the CDE as it develops its concepts of what’s typical development. Please check out these foundations and contribute your experience and insights so that they truly reflect the development of all California’s young children.

Labels: ,

Friday, March 16, 2007

What will California expect of preschoolers? Your input needed!!

The California Department of Education is developing “early learning foundations,” documents that describe what typically developing children can be expected to be able to do at age three and at age four. The first set of “foundations” will be on:
Social/emotional development
English learners
Language and literacy
Mathematics

The department prepared a first draft of the foundations and held invitational sessions in March where “stakeholders” could provide feedback.

Then they revised the foundations and developed new drafts, which you can see online at http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/re/psfoundations.asp

In April and May they will be holding dozens of “regional input sessions” around the state, open to anyone who wants to go and provide feedback on the second draft, which is planned to go up on the web site April 9. This is a crucial opportunity for people who know and care about young children to influence the expectations that will help shape California’s preschool educational policies!!!

You can see a complete list of times and places for these sessions at:
http://www.sonoma.edu/cihs/cpin/pdf/All%20Region%20Input%20Sessions%20%20(3).pdf

In addition, there will be four public hearings on the foundations, all held 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m:
May 11, 2007 - California Department of Education, Sacramento
May 16, 2007 - Fresno County Office of Education
May 17, 2007 - San Mateo County Office of Education
May 22, 2007 - Los Angeles County Office of Education

I don't really know what the difference is between an "input session" and a "public hearing," but whatever, these are all places and times where you can go and express your views.

You can also provide feedback through the web site where the foundations are posted.

Parents and child care/preschool teachers are the ones who really know little kids. Your experience and wisdom are necessary to make this come out right!

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Wanted: the political courage to raise revenues!

California advocates for children should take some inspiration from Illinois, where the governor and the teachers’ union are now fighting for a new tax on business transactions to fund a new $10 billion investment in schools.

The funds would boost school spending by 23% in the next year, increase the amount spent on each student, and expand preschool programs.

The new tax would raise money from the service sector -- the only part of the economy that’s expanding. One of the reasons California is in a constant budget crisis is that the sales tax, a major source of revenue, only applies to sales of goods, stuff, while a larger and larger part of our economy is services. A sales tax on some services is only one of many practical, good ideas for raising revenue from the people who can afford to pay. For more ideas, see http://www.caltaxreform.org

Of course businesses in Illinois are claiming, as they always do when asked to carry some of the weight, that the new tax would drive businesses out of the state. Governor Blagojevich says that the business lobbyists are really interested in convincing legislators ''to get off of tax fairness and go back to taxing people.''

''It will be Armageddon, but we are on the side of the Lord and we will prevail,'' Blagojevich told a cheering audience of 1,200 teachers.

Advocates for children, whatever their personal theology, have an obligation to reject the current bad political choices and change the political balance--with a powerful campaign demanding that the state raise enough revenue to meet kids’ needs.

You can read about the Illinois effort at:
http://www.suntimes.com/news/education/292664,031107blago.article

Labels: ,

Monday, March 12, 2007

Push for better health care

With SCHIP (Healthy Families in California) up for federal reauthorization this year and several health care reform proposals in the California legislature, advocates are pushing for better health care for children and adults.

The Children's Defense Fund has two campaigns for health insurance for all children in the US:

Covering All Children in 2007 is a campaign to ensure that all children have comprehensive health and mental health care. For more information, contact the Children's Defense Fund, 202-628-8787, http://www.childrensdefense.org/site/PageServer?pagename=healthy_child

Elect Susie is a fictional presidential campaign for Susie Flynn, a 10-year-old girl who is calling for health insurance for all children in the US. For information about the campaign (sponsored by the Children's Defense Fund), visit http://www.electsusie.com

Health Access and organizations representing seniors, labor, and people of color are pushing for better health care in California:

It's Our Health Care is a campaign for quality, affordable health care in California. It will include outreach to gather health care stories and concerns, town hall meetings around the state, house parties, and opportunities to communicate with policymakers about health care reform proposals. For more information, contact Health Access, 916-442-2308, http://www.itsourhealthcare.org

Health Access also has a new-ish blog at http://www.health-access.org/blogger.html

Labels: , , ,

Get active on children's issues

Lots of advocacy events are heading our way this spring -- great ways to get active for children and families, or if you're already active, here's some events you can use to get other folks involved! Here's some info on the ones I know about so far ... but sign up for our monthly email bulletin to keep up-to-date.

Mar 30: Eliminating Childhood Obesity Town Hall Meeting is an opportunity to discusses strategies for reducing childhood obesity and supporting children's health through communities and schools. Los Angeles. For more information, contact the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, la@rwjf.org

Apr 22: Week of the Young Child is a day to bring attention to the needs of children and their families. For more information, contact the National Association for the Education of Young Children, (800) 424-2460; http://www.naeyc.org/about/woyc

Apr 22: Earth Day is a day for children to learn about and participate in activities related to the environment. For more information or events in California, contact Earth Day Network, (202) 518-0044; http://www.earthday.org

Apr 30: Día de los Niños is a day to honor and celebrate children. For more information, contact National Latino Children's Institute, http://www.nlci.org/DLN2004/dlnmain.htm

Apr 30: National Healthy Schools Day is a day to support school environments that are clean and in good repair to better foster health and learning. For more information and a guide with event ideas, contact Healthy Schools Network, Jen Sentar, 202-543-7555, http://www.healthyschools.org/nhs_day.html

May 1: Worthy Wage Day is a day to increase awareness of the need for adequate wages for child care providers to ensure quality care for children. For more information, contact the Center for the Child Care Workforce, 202-662-8005; http://www.ccw.org/about_wage.html

May 2: Stand for Children with Parent Voices is an opportunity to advocate for quality early childhood programs with hundreds of parents from all over California. Sacramento. For more information, contact Parent Voices at 415-882-0234

May 15: ENACT is an opportunity for advocates to talk with legislators about nutrition and physical activity. Sacramento. For more information, contact California Center for Public Health Advocacy, Alyssa Walker, 530-297-6000, http://www.cfpa.net/ENACT2007/index.htm

May 24: California Afterschool Challenge is an opportunity to thank legislators for recent laws that have expanded and enhanced afterschool programs -- and to call for additional afterschool funding. For more information, contact California School-Age Consortium, Annie Nogg, (415) 957-9775, http://calsac.org/events_page.asp?eventID=546

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

California “Early Learning Foundations”

This spring you will have several opportunities to influence California’s expectations for preschoolers’ development.
The Child Development Division of the California Department of Education is doing a great job at inviting—and listening to!—input from the Early Care and Education community as they develop their “Early Learning Foundations” in four areas:
* Social/emotional development
* English language learning (for kids whose first language is not English)
* Language and literacy
* Mathematics
(next year they will add other areas).
These are not supposed to be tests or requirements, but descriptions of typical development in three- and four-year-olds.
The fact that they start with social/emotional development and English learning is already a sign that the CDD has listened to the field. (Their first standards were just for literacy and math, but they heard from a lot of people that social/emotional development and English learning were essential).
The first draft of the “foundations” was developed by researchers looking at a lot of studies and experience from the field.
The department then invited “stakeholders” to four all-day sessions to give feedback. I attended two of those sessions and I have to say I was really impressed with the level of discussion. On the whole, people were very pleased with the drafts, but they weren’t shy about making dozens and dozens of criticisms and suggestions for change, which the researchers and CDD people received very graciously--they seemed eager to make changes based on the input. So that was very cool.
Their goal is to incorporate the suggestions and get the next draft on the web site by April 9.
The next step is public regional input meetings, to be hosted by the California Preschool Instructional Network (CPIN) around the state in the next few months. There will also be an opportunity to give input on the foundations on the web site.
After that, hearings on the foundations will be held in mid-May.
Dates/times/places for the regional meetings are not yet available, but you can see a general outline of the process at http://www.sonoma.edu/cihs/cpin/standards.htm. When more info is available, I’ll let you know.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

The "self-esteem" trap

A professor at San Diego State has discovered that today’s college students are more self-centered and full of themselves than previous generations. Professor Jean Twenge gave kids a test for “narcissism” – that means basically that you think you’re all that and a bag of chips and nobody else is important. Two-thirds rated high on that scale, compared to only one-third in the ‘80s.
What's the problem?
The researchers—Tweng and Keith Campbell of the University of Georgia, say this is a problem because people who are narcissistic "are more likely to have romantic relationships that are short-lived, at risk for infidelity, lack emotional warmth, and to exhibit game-playing, dishonesty, and over-controlling and violent behaviors."
They blame efforts to promote kids’ “self-esteem.” For example, they quote a song they say is commonly sung to the tune of "Frere Jacques" in preschool: "I am special, I am special. Look at me."
But we want kids to feel secure and confident, right?
I think the problem is that our culture is so competitive and individualistic that we don’t know how to feel good about ourselves without feeling that we are better than other people. We think those are the same thing.
Actually, they are opposite.
If our feeling of safety and confidence is based on rating higher than others, we are continually anxious, somewhere deep down, about the possibility that someone will come along and rate higher than us. That’s why the researchers describe narcissistic people as being so tightly wound.
There's an alternative!
There is another choice. Actually, it’s the ethic that has been traditional in early childhood education: Everyone is important. You can feel secure because you are loved, however you perform. Everyone’s contribution is valuable. We are all valuable because we are part of the human family, which is part of the larger family of all living things on earth.
I remember, after years of therapy, the moment I said to the shrink: “Now I understand that love is different from getting a high score.”
Different consequences
Now, if you are trying to make kids nervous enough so that they work hard to perform well on standardized tests and grow up to be the kinds of people who work long hours and do whatever they are told because they are desperate to make a lot of money and achieve high status, you won’t want that. You will want people to compete for the limited amount of “self-esteem” that comes from winning a scarce prize.
But if you want children to feel safe and confident enough to learn and explore, and to grow up treasuring and nurturing their relationships with other people, you’ll award prizes less, and hug and smile more.
Get this book!
Recently a children’s book called “Hooray for Me!” arrived in our office. At first I was disgusted, because of this narcissism thing. But because it was illustrated by Vera Williams, who I think is great, I looked at it. And I was delighted to see that expresses exactly the values I think we should be teaching kids.
Who’s “me?” the book asks. And a picture shows dozens of houses with kids in them, each saying, “I’m me!’ “I’m me too!” “Me too!” etc.
Then the book asks: “What kind of me are you?” (Uh-oh, I thought. Here comes “the fastest runner,” “the best singer,” etc.)
But the answer was all about relationships: daughter, nephew, half-sister, friend, etc.
And they elaborate: “I am my baby brother’s sister.” I am my mother and father’s son.” All the way to “I am a great-grand-kitten.”
The book ends with a poem that concludes: “Hooray for us! Whatever we be. Hooray for you, Hooray for me.”
By Remy Charlip and Lilian Moore, illustrated, as I said, by Vera B. Williams, Tricycle Press.
Run out and get it!

Labels: